You can also enable more data fields, as described in the other sections. These have no direct relationship to your person except for the IP address currently being used and your Google Analytics identifiers. Google stores your device identifiers and we send tracking events (such as page requests) to Google Analytics.
#Chess plays how to
We measure how our page is used with Google Analytics so that we can decide which features to implement next and how to optimize our user experience. We use your local storage to save the difference between your local clock and our server time (serverUserTimeOffset), so that we are able to display the date and time of events correctly for you. For example, a new chess game will not be opened in all your current tabs. Additionally, a technical field is stored (singletab) to ensure that some interactions are only processed in the browser tab that is currently active. The only exception is that we monitor some requests with the IP address that you are currently using, so that we are able to detect malicious use or system defects. All of these fields are alpha-numeric, with almost no relation to your real identity.
A security identifier (csrf) is also stored to prevent a particular type of online attack. It contains a session ID - a unique, anonymous user ID combined with an authentication identifier (user_data). A so-called cookie stores identifiers that make it possible to respond to your individual requests. Some data is technically necessary to be able to visit the page at all. Have a look at the following video for a sneak peak: Obviously you can debate a lot of things in it, but it does actually manage to get some quantifiable numbers where you can compare persons of very decent periods. And like that he is trying to get some kind of objective numbers in order to compare players, not in the quality of their game, but how they did towards others of their time. To do that, we are using the statistics by Jeff Sonas, who has created a site called Chessmetrics where he does an incredible historical analysis of all tournaments and tried to create world rankings and performance rankings and actual rankings of all the players for a really huge part of history. And he was saying that you can only compare people to their time, and you have to compare how they did in that respect. I fully agree with you, I actually spoke about this with one of the persons who will be in the top 50, Bent Larsen. The new generation is always standing on the shoulders of the previous generation, so to say this guy is greater than that guy, I've struggled with. I've been dodging these debates because obviously for such a list, if you do it of all time, you have to do some cross-era comparisons and I've always argued you can't really compare people from different generations.
0 kommentar(er)
